Nnamdi Kanu’s trial under ‘repealed’ law, mere charade – Lawyer

Date:

Human rights lawyer, Barr. Christopher Chidera, has expressed concern over the Nigerian government’s plan to prosecute Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), under the repealed Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act 2013, describing it as legally unsustainable.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

In a statement issued in Abuja, Barr. Chidera argued that the revoked 2013 Act cannot serve as a basis for Kanu’s trial.

“Any attempt to prosecute the IPOB leader under the Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act 2013 is legally untenable and procedurally flawed,” the lawyer stated.

He urged President Bola Tinubu’s administration to negotiate with Kanu before 20 March 2025 to avoid exposing systemic flaws in Nigeria’s justice system.

“The section of the Terrorism Prevention (Amendment) Act 2013 on which the prosecution relies is no longer an active law in Nigeria. The jurisdiction to prosecute Kanu under this Act ceased with its repeal. Continuing with this prosecution would draw scrutiny and criticism both domestically and internationally,” Chidera added.

Kanu is due to represent himself in court on 21 March 2025, a move that could heighten scrutiny of Nigeria’s judiciary.

“Reports that Mazi Kanu will assume his own defence on 21 March 2025 signal a significant shift in this case. His self-representation may reveal inconsistencies and vulnerabilities within Nigeria’s judicial system,” he said.

Barr. Chidera described the case as a critical test for Nigeria’s judiciary, with significant political and legal implications. He called on Tinubu’s government to reconsider the proposed prosecution and seek an amicable resolution with Mazi Nnamdi Kanu before midnight on 20 March 2025.

“Political dissent cannot be extinguished by force, and the Biafran struggle will not be subdued by crackdowns or detention without trial,” Chidera emphasised.

As the trial date approaches, legal analysts warn that proceeding with charges based on a defunct law could damage the credibility of Nigeria’s judicial system and raise human rights concerns at the international level.

(www.naija247news.com)

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

“Trump Slaps Massive Fees on Chinese-Made Ships to ‘End Dominance,’ Risking Global Trade Fallout!”

In a dramatic escalation of the U.S.-China trade standoff,...

Lagos Woman Dies After Alleged Negligence at LASUTH, Family Claims

Lagos, April 18, 2025 (Naija247news) – Margaret Mowalola Akinduntire,...