Supreme Court agrees forfeiture of Patience Jonathan’s $8.4 million to FG

0
440

Godwin Tsa, Abuja

The Supreme Court has upheld the interim forfeiture order permitting the Federal government to seize about $8.4million traceable to the wife of former President Goodwill Jonathan, Patience, by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

In affirming the decision of the Lagos division of the Court of Appeal on the subject matter, the apex court unanimously agreed that the lower court was right to have affirmed the forfeiture order, saying there was no reason to interfere with concurrent findings of the lower courts.

A five-man panel of the apex court led by Justice Dattijo Muhammad, refused to set aside the order of temporary forfeiture that was issued against Mrs. Jonathan by a Federal High Court in Lagos.

The court consequently threw out the appeal Mrs. Jonathan filed before it as grossly lacking in merit.

The court said the appellant should return to the high court to show cause why the seized funds should not be permanently forfeited to Federal government.

According to Justice Kumai Aka’ahs who prepared the lead judgment of the Supreme Court that was delivered by another member of the panel, Justice Ejembi Eko, “the appellant is to go back to the trial court to show cause why the interim order should not be made permanent.”

Besides, the Supreme Court refused Mrs. Jonathan’s prayer for Section 17 of the Advanced Fee Fraud Act and other Fraud related offences Act, which the trial court relied on to order FG to take possession of the seized funds.

It would be recalled that EFCC had on the strength of an ex-parte application and affidavit evidence it filed before the High Court in Lagos State, secured an order that allowed it to confiscate the sum of $8,435,788.84 and other funds in bank accounts it said were traced to the former First Lady.

In the application it filed pursuant to Section 17 of the Advanced Fee Fraud Act and other Fraud related offences Act, EFCC, alleged that the funds were suspected to be proceeds of crime and unlawful activities.

Meantime, in a ruling on April 20, 2018, trial Justice Mojisola Olatoregun granted the ex parte order. The trial court, aside granting the interim forfeiture order, directed the anti-graft agency to make a publication to enable Mrs Jonathan who was cited as a respondent in the ex-parte application, or anyone interested in the funds, to within 14 days, show cause why the final order of forfeiture should not be made in favour of the FG.

However, shortly after the order was made, Mrs. Jonathan went before the Court of Appeal to challenge the legal competence of EFCC’s ex-parte application to temporarily take ownership of the funds.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.