W/Bank urges Nigeria to implement Free Zones’ single regulatory authority to attract investors


by Joseph Afam

Lagos Nigeria, July 10, 2017 The World Bank has advocated for a single regulatory authority for the regulation of the operations of free zones in Nigeria stating its clear advantage.

The advice was delivered at the Public Hearing organized by House of Representatives Committee on Commerce to take input from stakeholders in respect of a proposed amendment to Oil and Gas Export Free Zone Authority (OGEFZA) Act.

In his presentation, Craig Raymond Giesze, Senior Operations Officer, Trade & Competitiveness Global Practice, World Bank Group stated that the World Bank has always advised countries seeking to attract investments into their economies through their free zones “to always adopt the single regulatory authority regime for a number of reasons based on knowledge garnered over the years of what foreign investors look out for in an economy.”

According to the Craig Giesze, “beyond the fact that a single regulatory authority is global best practice, the benefits include the fact it reduces administrative costs; the approach creates investor confidence in an economy; investors abhor a confusing regulatory environment and considers such environment as too risky but prefer consistency in regulation because a single regulatory authority offers long-term stability that guarantees safety of investments. In that regard, the World Bank perspective would be that Nigeria should seriously consider the adoption of a single regulatory authority regime for its free zones”.

In his opening remarks, the Chairman of the House Committee on Commerce, Hon. Sylvester Ogbaga, PDP Ebonyi State, informed the audience that the key objective of the public hearing was for invited stakeholders make an input that would assist the Committee in its legislative assignment of amending the proposed OGEFZA Act based on global best practice in order to increase the contribution of the free zones scheme to the national GDP.

It is interesting to note that the Managing Directors of both OGEFZA and NEPZA, both stated that the supervising ministry of both agencies had stated that it would need time to review and harmonise their respective submissions. Further, they requested a postponement of the public hearing pending the review of the ministry and the eventual submission of their memoranda.

In his submission, Adewale Dosunmu, General Counsel, Snake Island Integrated Free Zone (SIIFZ) advised the Committee to ensure fairness, equity and justice in the course of executing its assignment by ensuring that stakeholders are given an opportunity of publicly knowing and reacting to the submissions of Nigerian Export Processing Zones Authority (NEPZA) and Oil and Gas Export Free Zone Authority (OGEFZA) through a second public hearing by the Committee especially after harmonization of the positions of the two contending agencies by their supervising ministry the Federal Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment.

Continuing, Dosusmu pointed out to the Committee that four presidential and ministerial review committees set up by three previous administrations over the last two decades had recommended the merging of OGEFZA with NEPZA as best practice.

This would remove confusion as to who regulates what and would bolster investor confidence in Nigeria. In addition, it would reduce the cost of governance by eliminating double expenses for two agencies who would ultimately be performing the same function.

Furthermore, he informed the Committee that a proper examination of the existing OGEFZA Act for which the amendment was being sought would reveal that the intentions of the framers of the OGEFZA Act and that of then Head of State, General Sani Abacha was specifically to restrict OGEFZA operations to only Ikpokiri and Onne Zones.

He contended that the activities of OGEFZA over the years had not been in compliance with the provisions of the extant Act and proposed amendment in its current form would ratify years of unlawful activities.

Adewale also gave further example of the illegality of OGEFZA unwholesome desire by stating that OGEFZA out of the blues is insisting on regulating activities and operations of Snake Island Integrated Zone, a privately funded integrated free zone that does not engage in the export of oil and gas.

He concluded by urging the Chairman and members of the House Committee on Commerce to not only expunge offending sections of the OGEFZA amendment bill but recommended that the committee revisit the draft executive bill of 2006 that had proposed a single free zone authority in the light of the consistent recommendations by the different committees set up by successive administration’s from 1999.

This would propel Nigeria forward and help grow the economy and in turn help improve local capacity as is the case in other countries like the UAE.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.